TABLE OF CONTENTS:   Abstract...............................................................................................................

Fasteasylaw.com Deterrence Section 24(2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms       Introduction:   This paper involves a brief overview...

Introduction:   This paper will examine the implications of the Ontario court of Appeals decision in Mathur v Ontario 2024 , as it...

Introduction:   This paper will examine the implications of the Ontario court of appeals decision in Mathur v Ontario 2024 as it relates...

Introduction:     The  Succession Reference case of [1998] represented a unanimous judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada, in which...

Introduction:   The Supreme Court of Canada took on the issue of searches of cell phone conducted by police that are incidental to arrest...

Litigation is defined as the process of resolving disputes in court. The respective governments and those on the opposing sides in each...

The Legal and Political Nature of Public Inquiries Lines can often become Blurry.        Introduction:     Public Inquiry’s, from a...

This paper will exam the Supreme Court of Canada case Nevsun Resources v Araya et al 2019.  Nevsun Resources owned a mine in the country...

Introduction The Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) was given money and land by the Canadian government for the creation of a railway system...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1779613095398445126 https://x.com/i/status/1858708372737921198

I have to re do this article because the original was lost and this can be considered a rough copy. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20167/index.do The paper draws on the analogy of a possible bad traffic stop to help illustrate a difficult ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada. This paper is about when and where the Grant test maybe in need of a reset. By the SCC own words it does not matter if your Charter rights are violated, they are not vocalized as a s

R. v. Abdelrazzaq, sets the standard for being charged with a crime and now having to face a second charge for ultimately doing the same...

Supreme Court of Canada R. v. Sault Ste. Marie, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299 Date: 1978-05-01 Her Majesty The Queen on the Information of Mark...

The case https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2020/2020onca609/2020onca609.pdf Did Jordan change anything for trials regarding...

The case is York v Wadood and Davis (2017) Ont. Court of Appeal, https://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions/2017/2017ONCA0045.htm?platform=...

Help to Hart I think it was in the "Ethics in the Public Domain", that Raz answered an important question that the critics of Hart asked...

The interpretive theory of Dworkin challenges Harts positivism. He found the law more complicated than what Hart depicted as a system of...

There are various theorists in Feminist legal theory that espouse the same belief in that society and the legal order are patriarchal....

It was L Sankey in Woolmington v DPP [1935] who said ” it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoners guilt”. The burden of...